Reaction time benchmark — is 220 ms good?

Is 220 ms a Good Reaction Time?

Yes. A 220 ms reaction time is Above Average — it puts you in the top 35% of people on a standard visual reaction test.

If you got 220 ms, here is exactly where you stand, what it means, and whether it is worth chasing the next tier.

220 ms Falls in the "Above Average" Tier

Reaction time is usually measured as simple visual reaction time: one stimulus, one click. The common benchmark tiers look like this:

TierSimple Visual RTWho Scores Here
World Class100-150 msTop 0.1%. Olympic sprinters, elite F1 drivers, fastest esports pros.
Elite150-180 msTop 1%. Pro FPS gamers, fighter pilots, pro table tennis players.
Excellent180-210 msTop 5%. Competitive ranked gamers, amateur racers, varsity athletes.
Above Average210-250 msTop 35%. Healthy active adults, regular casual gamers.
Average250-300 msThe middle 50%. Normal adults with no specific training.
Below Average300-400 msBottom 15%. Often sleep deprivation or sedentary lifestyle.
Very Slow400 ms+Bottom 2%. Worth a closer look at sleep or health.

220 ms sits inside the Above Average tier.

220 ms by Age

Raw numbers only tell half the story. Reaction time slows with age, so a 220 ms is worth more at 45 than at 18. Here is how "excellent" shifts across the lifespan:

AgeExcellent (Top 10%)Where 220 ms lands
18-25<185 msSolidly good, just outside the top 10%
26-35<195 msExcellent — inside the top 10%
36-45<210 msExcellent — comfortably ahead
46-55<235 msExceptional for your age
56+<260 msOff the charts

For an 18-25 year old, 220 ms is genuinely good but not elite — the fastest of your peers are in the 150-170 ms range. For anyone 30 or older, 220 ms is genuinely excellent and better than most people your age will ever score.

What 220 ms Means in Practice

Gaming

In a CS2 or Valorant duel, a 220 ms player wins the click race against an average 250 ms player roughly 7 times out of 10. You are fast enough that reaction time is no longer your bottleneck — aim, crosshair placement, and game sense are. The people who beat you at 220 ms are not beating you because of raw speed.

Driving

At 60 mph, the difference between a 220 ms and a 250 ms reaction time is about 5 feet before you touch the brake. That is real, but it is not the thing that saves you — scanning the road and leaving proper following distance matter more. A 220 ms reaction time is more than fast enough for safe driving.

Sports

220 ms is strong for most reactive sports. It is fast for a goalkeeper, a tennis return, or a boxing slip. It is not Olympic-sprinter territory (those are under 150 ms off the blocks), but it is comfortably in the varsity-athlete range.

Can You Improve From 220 ms?

Yes, but the ceiling is close. Going from 220 to 170 ms is a jump from the top 5% to the top 1%, and it takes consistent practice, not a weekend. The honest levers are:

For most people at 220 ms, the better investment is improving accuracy and decision-making, not chasing the last 20 ms. Fast hands with slow decisions lose to average hands with good decisions every time.

How Was Your 220 ms Measured?

Make sure you are comparing apples to apples. A 220 ms on a simple visual test (click when green) is excellent. But a 220 ms on a choice test (click the highlighted target among several) would be world-class, because choice reaction time is typically 50-100 ms slower. Know which test you took before you celebrate or panic.

If you have not run a proper test yet, take the free test here and get your real median over 5 attempts.

Want to confirm your score? Test your reaction time in 30 seconds.
Take the Free Reaction Time Test